![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Groups | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Go to DV247.com | |
| New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here? | ||||||||||
| Pro Audio Mixers, mics, outboard, monitors, headphones |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
|
Richie,
Even though I had better keep my own thoughts on these matters to myself I think you might be confusing "desirable" with accurate. It is too new to get on "The List" but it would be interesting to see where the Focusrite ISA One fairs. The recent review in SoS gave a distortion level of 0.001% (-80dB, which is as near buggerall as makes no never...) and a frequency response, one assumes flat, with -3dB points at 16Hz and 118kHz ( the latter figure is madness IMHO!). And yet Paul White, the reviewer states, "The isa has a definite character, it comes over as being quite flattering....". How? Why? And why is nobody with the wherewithall trying to find out?! For those who do not already know (I didn't) the ISA is based on an old Neve design. Well, that's ONE of my hobbyhorses exercised for the night! Dave. |
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
Frank ______________________________
Frank Oesterheld GIK Acoustics GIK Bradford Now Open! www.gikacoustics.com (+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK) |
|
|
|
||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
|
That makes sense, it's the sound we grew up with and the sound we fell in love with, so it's bound to sound desirable. It's certainly top of my shopping list.
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
Frank ______________________________
Frank Oesterheld GIK Acoustics GIK Bradford Now Open! www.gikacoustics.com (+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK) |
|
|
|
||
|
Pushing the Envelope
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
|
Quote:
I think it's going to have to be the API 2D, Chandler TD2 or a DAV product if I'm feeling particularly thrifty, then. Naturally, after three years of saving. |
|
|
|
||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
Frank ______________________________
Frank Oesterheld GIK Acoustics GIK Bradford Now Open! www.gikacoustics.com (+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK) |
|
|
|
||
|
Mic Check 1!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
|
wow! We disagree on something! I'd take the TG2 any day!
![]() ______________________________
You can't polish a turd! (unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!) |
|
|
|
|
Sound Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,122
|
I'd go Chandler, then API, then DAV in order of preference, however, if you need the inbuilt converter, that's a nice feature on the API. As I'm using a Digital Konnekt x32 as the hub of my studio now I like preamps with their own ADCs, as long as they're decent.
|
|
|
|
|
Pushing the Envelope
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pushing the Envelope
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
|
Quote:
May have to start dribbling over the thought of one of these. One question - and this may be very stupid indeed, but here we go. My current interface is a Mackie Onyx 400F, and an EMU 1212m. If I used the SPDIF output from the API (which is clearly going have superior ADCs) into either of the above, would it bypass their A/Ds? Naturally, there'd be no point having great ADCs on the API then degrading them via a less qualified card. You know when you have a mental block and ask stupid questions? Well, here I am. |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which Preamp? | sphelan | Pro Audio | 72 | 14th October 2008 03:09 PM |
| Microphone preamp combination | yonkolai | Pro Audio | 10 | 6th August 2008 09:08 AM |