DV247 Forums Nitin Sawhney Interview
Go Back   DV247 Forums > Music Equipment Discussion > Pro Audio
Forgot Password? Join Us!
Home Register Groups FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Go to DV247.com
New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here?

Pro Audio Mixers, mics, outboard, monitors, headphones

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008 , 11:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
Default

It's very interesting to see the Neve 1073 listed as one of the least transparent pre's, yet it's generally known as one of the most desirable.
Richie is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008 , 08:10 PM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Richie,

Even though I had better keep my own thoughts on these matters to myself I think you might be confusing "desirable" with accurate.

It is too new to get on "The List" but it would be interesting to see where the Focusrite ISA One fairs. The recent review in SoS gave a distortion level of 0.001% (-80dB, which is as near buggerall as makes no never...) and a frequency response, one assumes flat, with -3dB points at 16Hz and 118kHz ( the latter figure is madness IMHO!). And yet Paul White, the reviewer states, "The isa has a definite character, it comes over as being quite flattering....".

How? Why? And why is nobody with the wherewithall trying to find out?!

For those who do not already know (I didn't) the ISA is based on an old Neve design.

Well, that's ONE of my hobbyhorses exercised for the night!

Dave.
ecc83 is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008 , 09:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie View Post
It's very interesting to see the Neve 1073 listed as one of the least transparent pre's, yet it's generally known as one of the most desirable.
Probably simply because it's heard the most often. There are probably more copies of the 1073 design than anything else...it's the sound of music for the last 30 years.

Frank
______________________________
Frank Oesterheld
GIK Acoustics
GIK Bradford Now Open!
www.gikacoustics.com
(+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK)
FrankGIK is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008 , 10:21 PM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Just given the other old nag a canter on Class bloody A!

Dave.
ecc83 is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 21st September 2008 , 06:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankGIK View Post
Probably simply because it's heard the most often. There are probably more copies of the 1073 design than anything else...it's the sound of music for the last 30 years.

Frank
That makes sense, it's the sound we grew up with and the sound we fell in love with, so it's bound to sound desirable. It's certainly top of my shopping list.
Richie is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 04:19 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
Default

Has anybody got any experience with the Universal Audio 610?

Any comments? Opinions?
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 04:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutilatedlip View Post
Has anybody got any experience with the Universal Audio 610?

Any comments? Opinions?
Like it, but don't *love* it. It didn't get much use...bass, snare, acoustic guitar...the very occasional vocal. I thought it had a kind of irritating, over cooked quality to it. It's better than ART's MPA Gold, but not by much.

Frank
______________________________
Frank Oesterheld
GIK Acoustics
GIK Bradford Now Open!
www.gikacoustics.com
(+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK)
FrankGIK is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 05:10 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankGIK View Post
Like it, but don't *love* it. It didn't get much use...bass, snare, acoustic guitar...the very occasional vocal. I thought it had a kind of irritating, over cooked quality to it. It's better than ART's MPA Gold, but not by much.

Frank
Thanks Frank.

I think it's going to have to be the API 2D, Chandler TD2 or a DAV product if I'm feeling particularly thrifty, then. Naturally, after three years of saving.
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 05:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutilatedlip View Post
Thanks Frank.

I think it's going to have to be the API 2D, Chandler TD2 or a DAV product if I'm feeling particularly thrifty, then. Naturally, after three years of saving.
I'd drop the others and pick up the API 2D. It's not even a close contest.

Frank
______________________________
Frank Oesterheld
GIK Acoustics
GIK Bradford Now Open!
www.gikacoustics.com
(+44) 020 7558 8976 (UK)
FrankGIK is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 06:47 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

wow! We disagree on something! I'd take the TG2 any day!


Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankGIK View Post
I'd drop the others and pick up the API 2D. It's not even a close contest.

Frank
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2008 , 07:01 PM
Sound Guru
 
terminal3's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,122
Default

I'd go Chandler, then API, then DAV in order of preference, however, if you need the inbuilt converter, that's a nice feature on the API. As I'm using a Digital Konnekt x32 as the hub of my studio now I like preamps with their own ADCs, as long as they're decent.
terminal3 is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 29th September 2008 , 01:16 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal3 View Post
I'd go Chandler, then API, then DAV in order of preference, however, if you need the inbuilt converter, that's a nice feature on the API. As I'm using a Digital Konnekt x32 as the hub of my studio now I like preamps with their own ADCs, as long as they're decent.
I think it's safe to assume that the API ADCs would be of a high standard, isn't it?
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 29th September 2008 , 01:35 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

Haven't heard them but I understand they are pretty good.
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 29th September 2008 , 01:43 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevCircleStudios View Post
Haven't heard them but I understand they are pretty good.
Reviews are exceptionally good across the board!

May have to start dribbling over the thought of one of these.

One question - and this may be very stupid indeed, but here we go.

My current interface is a Mackie Onyx 400F, and an EMU 1212m.

If I used the SPDIF output from the API (which is clearly going have superior ADCs) into either of the above, would it bypass their A/Ds?

Naturally, there'd be no point having great ADCs on the API then degrading them via a less qualified card.

You know when you have a mental block and ask stupid questions? Well, here I am.
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 29th September 2008 , 01:47 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

Yes. If your interface has digital in it doesn not go through conversion.
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Preamp? sphelan Pro Audio 72 14th October 2008 03:09 PM
Microphone preamp combination yonkolai Pro Audio 10 6th August 2008 09:08 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© 1999-2008 Digital Village. All rights reserved.