DV247 Forums DV Retail Warehouse
Go Back   DV247 Forums > Music Equipment Discussion > Music Software
Forgot Password? Join Us!
Home Register Groups FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Go to DV247.com
New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here?

Music Software Virtual instruments, plug-ins, effects, audio-editing, processing & scoring software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 12:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default DAW's Does it Matter Which One?

Hi All

I was bored over the weekend so I downloaded the M-Audio Pro Tools software,and I wish I had left it where it was,cos I like it.

I have been using Sonar for 2 years now,but I wondered if it made any difference sound wise which DAW we used?

I must say that my recorded stuff sounded better in playback in Pro Tools,or was that just my imagination?

Any input welcome.

Thanks

Alan
asimmd is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 02:03 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

There is no substantial difference in terms of sound (technically there will be algorithmic differences but unless you have golden ears they are unlikely to be noticeable to you). Put it this way, when did you ever hear anyone whistling the sound of a particular daw! People prefer different daws primarily for workflow and features reasons. Just don't sweat it, go with what feels best and make some music.
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 02:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Many thanks for the reply,I agree with what you said but,does the same thing apply to the interface?

Mine is a rather ancient M-Audio Delta 4/10?

Thanks

Alan
asimmd is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 02:40 PM
Administrator
 
modz1's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
Many thanks for the reply,I agree with what you said but,does the same thing apply to the interface?
Go get it Trev!!
______________________________
"The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long.."
modz1 is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 03:09 PM
Forum Scribe
 
Monarch's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
Many thanks for the reply,I agree with what you said but,does the same thing apply to the interface?

Mine is a rather ancient M-Audio Delta 4/10?

Thanks

Alan
I would say defintely. There is no way the older Delta can compare with a more recent Echo, RME or Lynx offering IMO.

If you are currently looking for an interface here is a discussion where that question was met with quite a few responses. Even more responses to a similar question can be found here. Another topic here discusses a sound card purchase.

As you may already know room treatment is yet another important consideration. (On my list of to do's)

But as modz1 implied...Trev is without a doubt one of *the* hardware experts on this forum and will be able to go into more detail than I can.
______________________________
Need categorised help in a hurry? Try the DV Forum Start Page.
Monarch is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 03:23 PM
Forum Idol
 
sureno's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west london depot
Posts: 4,179
Default

you know im no expert far from it but i love the way a mix sounds "better" when mix down in pro tools, i dont know what it is but it just does, it's very subtle but its as if it gives it that little bit extra. its probably nonsense but thought id through my bit in, il wait a little to have it angrily thrown back
______________________________
I'v licked my fair share of Peanut Butter!!!
(If i carry on pushing the boundries i may mysteriously disappear)
www.sureno.co.uk
sureno is online now Online
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 03:32 PM
Keeper o' the Keys!
 
Dave Boulden's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK.
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureno View Post
you know im no expert far from it but i love the way a mix sounds "better" when mix down in pro tools, i dont know what it is but it just does, it's very subtle but its as if it gives it that little bit extra. its probably nonsense but thought id through my bit in, il wait a little to have it angrily thrown back
I'm not disagreeing with you, but perhaps it's not the PT audio engine itself that makes it sound sweeter to your ears but possibly the way PT leads you to mix your tracks makes it sound sweeter... a different workflow may lead to setting up your FX chain, bussing and routing differently. It may well be a useful exercise to go over the order in which you apply things in PT as compared to whichever other DAWs you use and try the same order as far as you can in your other DAW to see if it gives you that same "sweeter sound".

______________________________
http://www.daveboulden.co.uk/
Dave Boulden is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 03:38 PM
Forum Idol
 
sureno's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west london depot
Posts: 4,179
Default

even bouncing stems out of logic and putting it in tools just sounds crisp???
fully acknowledge it could be a number of reasons but im certainly not complaing
______________________________
I'v licked my fair share of Peanut Butter!!!
(If i carry on pushing the boundries i may mysteriously disappear)
www.sureno.co.uk
sureno is online now Online
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 04:39 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Well I am glad it's not just me who thinks Pro Tools sounds better,but I couldn't tell you why either.

The chat we had about an interface a couple of months ago was fine,I was all for getting a Fireface 400,then what,they put the flippin price up???

OK,I was also thinking of an HDSP 96/32 PCI Card,but the new PCI-E cards are due soon(Ha Ha)so would I be buying old stock if I went for one of these?

I definately need help.

Alan
asimmd is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 11:10 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
Many thanks for the reply,I agree with what you said but,does the same thing apply to the interface?

Mine is a rather ancient M-Audio Delta 4/10?

Thanks

Alan
Actually while the 410 is a bit ancient and converter quality has probably moved on to the extent that it would be worthwhile upgrading when you can, you would likely see a bigger difference in quality by adding a decent preamp and/or some room treatment to your setup before changing your converter which IMO are probably the last thing in your chain worth changing (in bang for buck terms).

You can find out more about room treatment, preamps and upgrading your interface on Monarch's helpful index page, here:

Start Page...
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 1st December 2008 , 11:12 PM
Mic Check 1!
 
TrevCircleStudios's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
[snip]...but the new PCI-E cards are due soon(Ha Ha)so would I be buying old stock if I went for one of these?

I definately need help.

Alan
If the PCI will work in your computer the PCIe will not. Work out what you need before buying or you could find yourself with an expensive white elephant/interface you have no use for.
______________________________
You can't polish a turd!

(unless it's a jettsetty and urbane one!)
TrevCircleStudios is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 2nd December 2008 , 09:07 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Hi Trev

Thanks for the replies.

I don't understand your comment about the PCI or PCI-E cards working in my computer,I have both slots available.My computer is a self build;

Intel Quad 6600 on an Abit IP35 Pro - 4Gig Ram - BFG 8800 Graphics and my M-Audio Delta 4/10.

Signal path is all D.I Equipment as follows.

Guitar into Vox Tonelab - into Zoom RFX 2200 with Custom Echo's - Behringer Composer Pro Compressor - into Spirit M4 Mixer - into Sonar 8.0.

My question regarding the RME HDSP 96/32 was that as the new PCI-E versions of this are due soon,would It make sense to wait for those,or purchase a PCI HDSP 96/32 now?

I look forward to your comments.

Alan
asimmd is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2008 , 04:21 PM
Forum Scribe
 
Monarch's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
OK,I was also thinking of an HDSP 96/32 PCI Card,but the new PCI-E cards are due soon(Ha Ha)so would I be buying old stock if I went for one of these?

I definately need help.

Alan
If your PC can take a PCI -E card and has a free slot...then personally I would wait for the new versions.

If you can wait (no idea when they are coming out) then that is the route I would take. I would wait for a driver revision or two, but RME are pretty solid all round from what I have read.
______________________________
Need categorised help in a hurry? Try the DV Forum Start Page.
Monarch is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2008 , 08:25 PM
Senior Member
 
cane creek's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Posts: 135
Default

Doesnt matter at all which DAW you use , as long as its either Cubase or Logic
______________________________
canecreek.co.uk
cane creek is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2008 , 08:30 PM
Senior Member
 
cane creek's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middlesbrough , UK
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimmd View Post
Hi All

I was bored over the weekend so I downloaded the M-Audio Pro Tools software,and I wish I had left it where it was,cos I like it.

I have been using Sonar for 2 years now,but I wondered if it made any difference sound wise which DAW we used?
To be honest most DAW's (Pro-tools/Logic/Cubase/Live) will seem better than Sonar , Sonar is just about the only DAW ive demo'ed that i didnt like.
______________________________
canecreek.co.uk
cane creek is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A specific 'DAW's' Forum - is it time? modz1 Forum General Announcements 23 23rd September 2008 06:18 PM
Setting up vista for DAW's conor_j Music Software 9 18th August 2008 11:05 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© 1999-2008 Digital Village. All rights reserved.