![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Groups | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Go to DV247.com | |
| New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here? | ||||||||||
| Music Software Virtual instruments, plug-ins, effects, audio-editing, processing & scoring software |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cirencester, UK
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Quote:
Logic and Cubase have got the WORST reputation for customer service / bug fixing. Both companies give no indication of bugs being worked on, time scales of fixes or even regular updates. Apple is even worse than Steinberg is this respect, they don’t even have a recogonised big list. Steinberg continually upset certain customers by not delivering updates that were promised (even after a year’s wait), and most recently announcing there will be no more bug fixes for Cubase 4. Logic has had no update for 6 months. Sonar, on the other hand, has a very lively forum that is frequented by actually developers of Sonar. Users can report bugs and make requests. If I was ever tempted back to Windows (and I can’t think of anything that would make me do that), I think Sonar would be my DAW. The other thing I don’t understand is why Pro Tools is always “lumped in” with the others, it shouldn’t really be because it’s a different animal. It very much depends on what you are doing. For mixing/mastering/tracking and other things Pro Tools is the standard. But for composing 99% of users would choose a traditional DAW such as Logic / Cubase / Sonar / Live. No doubt Samplitude and Reaper should be in that list also, but I have no experience of them. I’m just saying that the list is a lot wider than just Logic / Cubase. ![]() ______________________________
Tyrone Howe Logic Pro 8.02, Access Virus TI Keyboard |
||
|
|
|||
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
|
Tyrone
Your comments make a lot of sense but I can't help thinking that we are all somewhat biased towards the DAW we use at any given time. I first started with Notator on the Atari 1040,moved to Logic and stayed till they sold out,I wasn't prepared to buy a new computer so I switched to Cubase,bad move for all the reasons you have stated. Being totally fed up with Steinbergs attitude,I started to look for an alternative and ended up with Sonar,now after 2 years it is becoming more obvious that all DAW's have their failings,and we need to try different ones in an effort to find the one most suited to our own personal needs. It's no good someone saying Cubase is the best,what they are really saying is that it's the best for their way of working. If Cakewalk would increase the notation part of Sonar,then a lot of people, including me would would be quite happy with it. As it is,Cakewalk are now a part of Roland,and I suppose they have to answer to them in any decisions that are taken. Hopefully,if enough of us complain about the notation,something will be done,we wait and see. Alan |
|
|
|
|
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cirencester, UK
Posts: 222
|
Hi Alan
First of all: Yes – I agree with everything you have said. The more people that understand and accept your post the better. ALL DAWS have their advantages and disadvantages (and that includes the approachability / honesty of the company). The only answer can be that you have to decide what is important to you personally, and then choose a DAW that has that as an advantage. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But for me, Steinberg would be the last company I would go to. ______________________________
Tyrone Howe Logic Pro 8.02, Access Virus TI Keyboard |
||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A specific 'DAW's' Forum - is it time? | modz1 | Forum General Announcements | 23 | 23rd September 2008 06:18 PM |
| Setting up vista for DAW's | conor_j | Music Software | 9 | 18th August 2008 11:05 AM |