DV247 Forums Wayne Lotek Interview
Go Back   DV247 Forums > Technique > Mastering
Forgot Password? Join Us!
Home Register Groups FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Go to DV247.com
New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here?

Mastering Get your stuff to sound right on your target medium

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 02:26 PM
Senior Member
 
RedDavid's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutilatedlip View Post

The problem is, does Joe Public really have the time and/or desire to actually listen for such intricacies in tmdoern music? If they're willing to adopt mp3/iTunes as their format of choice, it would appear not.

It looks like it.

I suppose, it's understandable in a way. We're visual creatures primarily, and we're much more confident with our eyes than we are with our ears. We recognise a colour far more easily than we can recognise a note, and we can recognise a blurry photo far more easily than we can recognise a poor recording. We as musicians, we tune our ears to hear these intricacies, but to your average punter, they don't hear, for example, a woodiness to an electric guitar's tone, they just hear an electric guitar.

On the plus side, it makes things easier for us. We needn't agnonize over differences in sounds (if they both have their merits, settle it with a coin toss). We needn't spend £2k on an electric guitar, when a Vintage or an Epiphone will supply all the sound we need. Plus, since the rough recording style is an accepted thing these days, we needn't stress about spending thousands on equipment. As long as it sounds good, that's good enough for the people. And they're your target market, afterall.

To be honest though, I'd be very happy to see albums released in multi-formats based on how they're going to be listened to. MP3 copy for the iPod with all the compression needed to make it sound okay, ditto for the CD copy, and then, a 96/24/5.1 versionspecially re-mixed and re-produced for those of us that still care. I'd be happy to pay a little extra for the HD version of an album, as I would for the HD version of a movie. Wouldn't lots of people?
RedDavid is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 02:58 PM
Costa Del Cool
 
sphelan's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 3,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDavid View Post
On the plus side, it makes things easier for us. We needn't agnonize over differences in sounds (if they both have their merits, settle it with a coin toss). We needn't spend £2k on an electric guitar, when a Vintage or an Epiphone will supply all the sound we need. Plus, since the rough recording style is an accepted thing these days, we needn't stress about spending thousands on equipment. As long as it sounds good, that's good enough for the people. And they're your target market, afterall.
Valid points RedDavid.

Why should we go to the trouble of spending a fortune on equipment?

My set up needs upgrading. My audio interface needs to be replaced. I need a preamp or two or three. I need to get better monitors. My Squire Strat is not up to the grade either. And what about the convertors I need? And then I have to consider the acoustic treatment. And when I get that done, I still have to fork out for a Mac. Why? What's the point if I'm going to upload my tunes to myspace or distribute them elsewhere in mp3 format so that my name gets out there?

Why? Why?

Because I take what I do seriously. Yes, it's a hobby at the moment but I hope it won't always be that way. And if it were to just stay as it is, I'd still want to produce the best damn music I can. I'd still want to improve my production skills just as I'd want to improve my songwriting or composition skills. I'd still strive for the best even if it may take a while and I may feel I will never reach the level I want.

Why do musicians spend so much time practising their instrument? Why do they change that worn out cheap piano or guitar for something better?

Why else but because we strive for perfection and development.

If we were to conform to what Joe Public wants, where would we be now? If groups like Metallica (who can afford to rest on their laurels a bit having already conquered the world) have their material packaged in the manner we are discussing here, why should we all conform? Why don't all the manufacturers make entry level equipment?

I still haven't heard the whole album but from what I have been reading here and elsewhere, Metallica must be hiding their faces in shame. They can argue that that's not what they produced but it has come out under their name. And as for the recording, mixing and mastering process here, it just makes me want to work harder at learning how to do all this production stuff to the best of my ability and then take it to someone who really knows what they are doing.

If loud is in fashion, let's hope it's one that passes quickly.
sphelan is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 03:17 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 555
Default

Personally, I've always striven to get the best sound and to use the best equipment, especially when gigging.

I've always refuted the idea of an all in one workstation, preferring to get a real analogue synth for analogue style sounds, a digital piano for piano sounds, a Nord Electro for hammond, along with pedals such as delay, filters, ring mod, tremolo to supply those effects instead of all in one.

In much the same way, I expect my guitarists to not use Line 6 stuff, and the drummer to play a real kit and not replace him with a drum machine (apart from on certain tracks).

I know that 99% of the audience won't be listening for authenticity but as musicians and true fans in love with what we do, I think in our own minds we'd be selling ourselves short.

I guess it's a similar deal with hi-fi separates as oppose to buying an all-in-one system. You could arguably get by and good quality with a hi-fi system, but you know you just want the best of the best and pick and choose the pieces as you want to give you the best quality.

I think we're all stricken with the disease to get make sure we do our part to ensure we both fulfill our own high standards, and remain authentic with it by buying every new bit of kit that comes out!

When people striving for the above are forced to compromise by people with different intentions (ie purely making money) then what can you do?
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 03:35 PM
Costa Del Cool
 
sphelan's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 3,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutilatedlip View Post
When people striving for the above are forced to compromise by people with different intentions (ie purely making money) then what can you do?
So, do you think we should just conform to what is imposed upon us? Or should we fight to make ourselves heard above the noise?
sphelan is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 04:26 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelan View Post
So, do you think we should just conform to what is imposed upon us? Or should we fight to make ourselves heard above the noise?
God no. Fight all the way!

Whenever I've played a gig and the trainspotter comes up afterwards (and there's always some!) and says 'nice Juno' or 'nice Moog' I always get a secret feeling in my stomach that connects with the comments of a fellow anally retentive person.

I am that man who stands near the front and eyes up the equipment at gigs.

Terrible, but someone's got to do it. Why give up what you love?

Let them ruin it if they must. Who cares. It's all about the process for me
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 06:02 PM
Member
 
Churst's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Staines, UK
Posts: 66
Default

wow, I should really check the threads I start more regularly!!

Some excellent points brought up. This forum is truely a great place...

In terms of the equipment debate though, I don't think we can blame Metallica for using cheap gear when their signature instruments, which they use on stage and in the studio, go for many thousands of pounds.

I think someone mentioned the "some kind of monster" documentary thing that they released? That piece showed that the band are into their musics sound (even if it did show that they are sometimes quite misinformed and overzealous as to how good their music actually is). While Lars does have his prima donna moments he is very serious about his music. He was so convinced that drum sound was "genius" that he was brave enough to push it against the advice of many. Which is something not many people are doing these days.
______________________________
If you're good at something, never do it for free!

PC: Intel Core2 Quad, 8GB RAM, Win7, Ableton Live 8 Suite, Remote Zero SL, Edirol FA-101, Asus Xonar D2 7.1
Churst is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 18th September 2008 , 08:54 PM
Hell-Rider
 
JAYDMF's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Churst View Post
wow, I should really check the threads I start more regularly!!

Some excellent points brought up. This forum is truely a great place...

In terms of the equipment debate though, I don't think we can blame Metallica for using cheap gear when their signature instruments, which they use on stage and in the studio, go for many thousands of pounds.
Yeah i have a KH2, its good but im glad i didnt pay £2000 list for it, my £700 explorer craps all over it in tone and feel. as for amps, well whose playing randall now ? randall tone is not mesa by a long way so that could put a nice spanner in the works
JAYDMF is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 19th September 2008 , 07:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 77
Default

I don't like or use I-tunes. o.k that's not so true. I'm divided. Put it this way. I haven't purchased an album from it. As a musician I wouldn't unless it was some obscure artist.
It's almost like...if you are an artist you have to be on I-tunes. Well....Led Zep never brought out singles.
FRETPICK is offline Offline
Last edited by FRETPICK; 19th September 2008 at 07:26 AM. . <
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 19th September 2008 , 01:45 PM
Pushing the Envelope
 
mutilatedlip's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 555
Default

Here's a classic example of what we've been talking about.

NME ran this story today, and added a Youtube video clip comparing the versions by way of demonstration.

What's most interesting, though, is neither the story or the video, but the first person's comment on the following page at the bottom. Kind of proves our point, sadly!

Metallica's 'Death Magnetic': 'Guitar Hero' beats CD? | News | NME.COM
mutilatedlip is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 19th September 2008 , 02:03 PM
Costa Del Cool
 
sphelan's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 3,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutilatedlip View Post
Here's a classic example of what we've been talking about.

NME ran this story today, and added a Youtube video clip comparing the versions by way of demonstration.

What's most interesting, though, is neither the story or the video, but the first person's comment on the following page at the bottom. Kind of proves our point, sadly!

Metallica's 'Death Magnetic': 'Guitar Hero' beats CD? | News | NME.COM
That's just pathetic! There's clearly a difference in the quality of the sound. I only suppose someone who would comment like that is so ear dead from listening to louder-is-better music that they must be more than happy with the CD they bought, or downloaded or stole or whatever.
sphelan is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2008 , 06:02 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Default

As I am currently mastering rock tracks I see that the latest fashion is to have everything as loud as everything else. If done carefully the loss of dynamics is reduced but having seen the waveform it is maxed out. How can a group like Metallica allow this to be released? Did they not listen to it? Apparently the music for one of the 'Guitar Hero' type games is on some peer to peer sites and the waveform for that is not maxed. Have they been mixed up by accident???

One of the groups who have bucked the trend recently is Whitesnake. Listen to their latest release. Sure it's not loud but...turn the hi-fi volume dial up. For such a busy mix it is clear. Listen to the Cowboy Junkies!!

We need to start a movement to get the sound right. Quality over quantity.
Brandesman is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 21st September 2008 , 08:30 PM
Forum Idol
 
sureno's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west london depot
Posts: 7,775
Default

Metallicas new track analysis
______________________________
Im a Mac and Windows 7 was not my idea
WWW.SURENO.CO.UK
www.myspace.com/djsureno
http://twitter.com/djsureno
sureno is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 21st September 2008 , 08:36 PM
Costa Del Cool
 
sphelan's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 3,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureno View Post
Metallicas new track analysis
Man, I never thought it was THAT BAD!!!
sphelan is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 21st September 2008 , 08:53 PM
Forum Idol
 
sureno's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west london depot
Posts: 7,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelan View Post
Man, I never thought it was THAT BAD!!!
sorry i should of put, joke by it
______________________________
Im a Mac and Windows 7 was not my idea
WWW.SURENO.CO.UK
www.myspace.com/djsureno
http://twitter.com/djsureno
sureno is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 22nd September 2008 , 09:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 30
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureno View Post
Metallicas new track analysis

That is a nasty nasty waveform!!!

Interestingly some artists are now backing away from this 'level war'.

It's a great shame that so many still haven't got it.
StratmanNick is offline Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
worst mastered album you bought waxxy Mastering 20 24th January 2009 01:05 AM
This is my album !!! kernell32 Promote Your Band 0 31st August 2008 10:05 PM
50 one-hit wonders - album covers & audio! terminal3 The Hot Link 11 7th August 2008 05:36 PM
Album Cover Photo World Atlas terminal3 The Hot Link 0 5th August 2008 11:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
© 1999-2008 Digital Village. All rights reserved.