Which one?

krooner · #1 (**permalink**) 27th October 2009 , 12:25 PM

Hi guys, newbie here.
Just been wondering, for ages actually, whether to record using PC - AT3525 + Edirol interface UA 101 + Cubase, or digitally record and mix just using the AT3525 + FMR RNP + BOSS BR 1200. I'm thinking mainly in terms of sound clarity [converter quality] . Any ideas would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Kj

terminal3 · #2 (**permalink**) 27th October 2009 , 12:28 PM

Do you have all these things?

I'd personally go the DAW route - but I'd use the RNP instead of the Edirol's built in preamp. Significant quality difference there.

So out of your whole list -

AT3525 -> RNP -> Edirol -> PC (Cubase)

I think that will give you the best overall result from that group of kit.

krooner · #3 (**permalink**) 27th October 2009 , 03:12 PM

[QUOTE=terminal3;41492]Do you have all these things?

I'd personally go the DAW route - but I'd use the RNP instead of the Edirol's built in preamp. Significant quality difference there.

So out of your whole list -

AT3525 -> RNP -> Edirol -> PC (Cubase)

I think that will give you the best overall result from that group of kit.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the advice, T3.
I do have this gear + a Yamaha MO8.
Think I'll sell the Boss [ I see it's gone up as much as 50% in price since I bought it in 2007. Wonder why

. ] and put the money towards the Lucid AC/DC converters. That's probably wiser than buying the Boss in the first place?
Cheers.
Kj

Home	Register	Groups	FAQ	Members List	Calendar	Search	Today's Posts	Mark Forums Read	Go to DV247.com
New to Forums or just joined? Why not start your journey here?

#1 (permalink) 27th October 2009 , 12:25 PM
krooner Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 4	Which one? Hi guys, newbie here. Just been wondering, for ages actually, whether to record using PC - AT3525 + Edirol interface UA 101 + Cubase, or digitally record and mix just using the AT3525 + FMR RNP + BOSS BR 1200. I'm thinking mainly in terms of sound clarity [converter quality] . Any ideas would be appreciated. Cheers, Kj
Offline

#2 (permalink) 27th October 2009 , 12:28 PM
terminal3 Sound Guru Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: London Posts: 2,176	Do you have all these things? I'd personally go the DAW route - but I'd use the RNP instead of the Edirol's built in preamp. Significant quality difference there. So out of your whole list - AT3525 -> RNP -> Edirol -> PC (Cubase) I think that will give you the best overall result from that group of kit. ______________________________ Worst signature ever.
Offline

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

#3 (permalink) 27th October 2009 , 03:12 PM
krooner Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 4	[QUOTE=terminal3;41492]Do you have all these things? I'd personally go the DAW route - but I'd use the RNP instead of the Edirol's built in preamp. Significant quality difference there. So out of your whole list - AT3525 -> RNP -> Edirol -> PC (Cubase) I think that will give you the best overall result from that group of kit.[/QUOTE] Thanks for the advice, T3. I do have this gear + a Yamaha MO8. Think I'll sell the Boss [ I see it's gone up as much as 50% in price since I bought it in 2007. Wonder why . ] and put the money towards the Lucid AC/DC converters. That's probably wiser than buying the Boss in the first place? Cheers. Kj
Offline