View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 1st October 2008 , 03:39 PM
Khazul
Furry Filter Phreak
 
Khazul's Avatar
          
           
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 915
Default

At a high level user vuew of functionality, then VST3 isnt really that big a deal, however it was needed as much of an architectural enhancement to deal with a bunch of pressing system issues - 64 bit, easier multi-channel scaling for higher end users. I dont buy that its is essential for side chaining - it isnt, however it does perhaps simplify this a bit at an architectural level.


For plugin developers however an architectural change can be a real pain, or not,it depends upon how you have designed your plugin. Multi-pltform plugin developers tend to fair better as they have often allready designed their plugins for easy adaptation.

As a developer starting to write a plugin - then actually Im targettig VST 2.4 only - the reason is simple - I dont care about running it in Cubase 4, I will only ever been running it in Ableton Live 7 onwards. Actually If Ableton had a public plugin SDK for thier own plugins, I would use that in preference to VST as it appears to allready address the benefits that VST3 could provide to a stereo DAW, and arguably in a better way for end users.
Khazul is offline Offline
Last edited by Khazul; 1st October 2008 at 03:46 PM. . <
Reply With Quote